Today we're benchmarking Just Cause 4 with a boatload of dissimilar GPUs to help you lot determine if your graphics carte du jour will handle this brand new title, and if need be, work out a suitable upgrade selection.

But Crusade 4 makes utilise of the Avalanche'south Apex game engine, though information technology is a newer updated version featuring diverse and extreme weather effects, including blizzards, sandstorms, tornadoes and more. The game engine has besides improved physics-based rendering, a new blitheness organization and refined AI, then NPCs can be smarter to attack and be more threatening.

This all sounds bully, only unfortunately the game has been received by mixed to average reviews in the few days it'south been out. Cited reasons include that the UI is terrible, the graphics are unimpressive and worst of all, the performance is horrible. In the short time we had to play it over, while a piffling clunky at times, the game seems like a lot of fun and nosotros're interested to see more. But to savor it we're using an RTX 2080 Ti at 1440p as this is required to maintain in a higher place 60 fps at all times, yep information technology'south that bad.

If you've got a GTX 1060, RX 580, or worse, this game is going to leave y'all bellyaching. For testing we're loading in at the beginning point, jumping in a auto and driving that off the bridge and into the jungle. The exam lasts 60 seconds and it paints an accurate moving picture of the kind of performance you tin expect.

We played the game to the point where you telephone call in reinforcements equally the battling NPCs add more load on the system. Included are 1080p, 1440p and 4K results for a massive range of graphics cards. Nosotros've as well got some additional testing at 1080p with new and one-time graphics cards using mid-range quality settings.

The criterion test bench consisted of a Core i7-8700K clocked at v GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 retentiveness. For the GeForce GPUs the 417.22 driver was used and for AMD, the Radeon Adrenalin 18.12.1.1 driver. Let'south go into the results.

Benchmarks

With all the graphics settings maxed out the game doesn't look amazing and in spite of that with a GTX 980 yous won't meet sixty fps on boilerplate at 1080p, same is true for the Fury Ten. Those with older-mid range options such as the GTX 970 and R9 390 tin can relish frame dips into the mid 30s. If you have a GTX 960 or R9 380, well, good luck.

Looking at the current generation GPUs nosotros have a few more options that were able to go on frame rates above 60 fps. The GTX 1060 6GB and RX 580 8GB failed to boilerplate 60 fps, though the Radeon GPU got mighty close.

College-end models such every bit Vega 64 and the GTX 1080 were unable to continue frame rates above lx fps in our exam, too. Ideally for that you'll desire an RTX 2070 or better, for playing at 1080p, information technology'southward like DXR is enabled (funny, but not funny).

1440p is basically out of the question for previous generation GPUs. The Fury X and GTX 980 Ti were struggling with average frame rates in the mid 40s. And so those playing at 1440p will require an RTX 2080 Ti to maintain over lx fps at all times, while the 2080 and 1080 Ti are expert for around 55 fps for the 1% low. Lower-end models such equally the GTX 1060 and RX 580 are basically a write off here, then I can't wait to see the 4K results.

Honestly, nosotros couldn't wait whatever different afterwards the 1080p and 1440p results. The RTX 2080 Ti does ok hither, as in not great just playable. Pretty crazy that nosotros are seeing Assassin's Creed Odyssey-like functioning in a game that looks nowhere about as good and Odyssey was bashed for its poor optimisation.

Then what if you driblet all settings down to medium, disable SSAO, and change the anti-aliasing method to FXAA?

Managing settings and reducing visual effect to medium boosts performance by around 30%, merely that's not plenty for most of these older GPUs. The much loved GTX 750 Ti averaged just 27 fps at 1080p using heavily dialed downwards quality settings. Even the current generation GTX 1050 was pretty horrible with regular dips beneath 30 fps.

The RX 570, R9 390 and GTX 970 couldn't continue frame rates higher up 60 fps at all times with the lower settings either. Finally, the GeForce GTX 580 (circa 2022) had to be dropped from the testing as it suffered massive graphical artifacts in this title.

Endmost Thoughts

We tin can understand why gamers are upset. In many ways Just Crusade 4 seems similar a downgrade from the iii-yr-old Just Cause iii. Character models and animation detail appear to be much the same, while the environment in some areas await a footling meliorate, merely many others don't and some are flat out far worse.

The water effects or lack thereof are and so bad in Just Cause 4. Surely this has to be a mistake, I mean, information technology really is laughable how bad the h2o looks. Just Cause 3 was amazing in comparing, with boats creating wakes, at that place were waves, ripples, and so on. The explosions don't expect equally good either in our opinion, they lack the item of the previous championship. The only impressive attribute is the weather system, some of the furnishings are quite good.

To make matters worse, operation shows the game is not properly optimized. Nosotros can't directly compare performance between the tertiary and 4th installments in the But Cause series, but on boilerplate we'd say yous're looking at 40-50% better performance using identical settings with Just Cause three.

Compared to mod titles, the performance is similar to what nosotros observed in Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey and we bashed that championship for being unoptimized and information technology looks mode better. Technically speaking, Only Cause four seems like a mess at launch. The programmer is already trying to address some of the major concerns as seen in this mail, but with less than a week since release, information technology's clear the game could accept used more time in QA before being delivered to gamers. Information technology's a real shame since the game itself seems decent and quite a bit of fun.

The poor performance isn't down to heavy CPU or memory usage either. Basically you'll become the aforementioned results with an older quad-core like the 7700K, and from what I tin tell the Ryzen vii 2700X is on par with the Core i9-9900K. The game'south engine age is starting to show as just one or 2 threads are heavily loaded, with the rest doing little piece of work. Still, we appear to be GPU express as CPU overclocking sees no real operation gain over stock.

For the most part 8GB of arrangement memory volition do and the need on VRAM isn't that high either. About 4.5 GB at 4K, iii.five GB at 1440p and three.3 GB at 1080p. Unless you're a large fan of the series, we'd avoid this title for the fourth dimension being.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • Radeon RX 570 on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1060 6GB on Amazon
  • Radeon RX 580 on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce GTX 1080 on Amazon, Newegg
  • GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg